Brotherly hundreds, and Crane's record

Stats highlights from another day at the SCG completely dominated by Australia

S Rajesh07-Jan-2018Shaun and Mitchell Marsh joined the illustrious pair of the Chappell and Waugh brothers in becoming only the third Australian brothers to scored hundreds in the same Test innings, piling on England’s agony in the field on the fourth day in Sydney. The Chappell brothers achieved this feat three times – twice, incredibly, in the same Test in Wellington in 1974 – while the Waugh brothers achieved it twice. Two of those previous five instances were against England – by the Waughs in 2001, and the Chappells in 1972 – and Australia won both those Tests.Getty ImagesEngland’s hard yardsAustralia’s total of 7 for 649 declared is the seventh-highest total conceded by England in away Tests. Four of the top ten such totals have come in their last seven overseas Tests. During this period, they have conceded 759 against India in Chennai, 662 in Perth, and 631 in Mumbai.

Highest totals conceded by Eng in away Tests

Total Overs Opposition Ground Year759/7d 190.4 Ind Chennai 2016751/5d 202 WI St John’s 2004749/9d 194.4 WI Bridgetown 2009681/8d 198.4 WI Port of Spain 1954662/9d 179.3 Aus Perth 2017659/8d 173.0×8 Aus Sydney 1946649/7d 193 Aus Sydney 2018645 158.6×8 Aus Brisbane 1946636/8d 156.2 Pak Lahore 2005631 182.3 Ind Mumbai 2016Australia’s run-festFor only the third time in their Test history, Australia’s Nos. 3-6 all scored more than 75. All three such instances have been against England, but the last one was way back in 1946. In fact, both such previous instances happened when Don Bradman was captain, in 1946 and in 1937. Australia’s total was their ninth best against England.Crane’s debut recordMason Crane, meanwhile, went for 193 runs in the Australian innings, the most conceded by an England bowler on debut. The previous highest was 166, by Devon Malcolm, also against Australia in 1989. Crane is in the all-time top five in this list, though the highest remains Suraj Randiv’s 222 conceded against India in 2010.

Most runs conceded by a bowler on Test debut

Player Overs Runs Wkts Opp Venue YearS Randiv 73 222 2 Ind Colombo (SSC) 2010JJ Krejza 43.5 215 8 Ind Nagpur 2008OAC Banks 40 204 3 Aus Bridgetown 2003NM Kulkarni 70 195 1 SL Colombo (RPS) 1997MS Crane 48 193 1 Aus Sydney 2018With Moeen Ali conceding 170 as well, this is only the second instance of two England bowlers conceding 170 or more in a Test innings; the previous instance was in Mumbai in December 2016, when both Adil Rashid and Moeen went over 170.Spin woesEngland’s spinners have collectively taken eight wickets for 900 runs in this series, in the 266.5 overs they have bowled. The average of 112.5 is their worst in the 132 series in which they have bowled at least 200 overs, and also the first time in these series that their average has exceeded 100. The previous worst for them was the 1999-2000 series in South Africa, when they averaged 82.85.

Worst ave for Eng spinners in a series (Min 200 overs)

Series Mat Overs Runs Wkts Ave SR Ashes, 2017-18 5 266.5 900 8 112.50 200.1Eng in SA, 1999-2000 5 214.4 580 7 82.85 184Ashes, 1907-08 5 317.4 971 13 74.69 146.6Ashes, 2013-14 5 261.5 1014 14 72.42 112.2Eng in WI, 1980-81 4 250.0 572 9 63.55 166.6

Sans Virat Kohli, where is India's backbone?

A lower-back injury might leave India without their captain at Trent Bridge. If that comes to pass, how will their beleaguered batting cope?

Nagraj Gollapudi13-Aug-2018On Sunday afternoon, as Virat Kohli lay flat on the ground, getting treatment on his lower back, he banged the turf with his clenched right fist. It was not just the reaction of a captain in pain. It was the reaction of man who knew India were now flattened in the series despite three Tests still remaining.After losing at Edgbaston, a Test they probably should have won, Kohli asked his batsmen to hold up a mirror and reflect upon their mistakes. That mirror lies shattered. All the Indian batsmen, including Kohli in the first innings, made it clear no lessons were learned.When none of your specialist batsmen cross 30 for four innings except one (Kohli), it is time for India to admit that their batting is in a rut. If only one batsman has made a century and fifty, as Kohli did at Edgbaston, you know there is a problem.What would worry India more is the fact that this has not been the first time their batting unit has failed to show the mental rigour, make the technical adjustments, and show the presence of mind to capture the moment and conquer bowlers overseas.The questions that confronted India’s batsmen in South Africa at the start of the year have only grown more pronounced. If anything, some more questions have piled up here in England. In South Africa, where Vernon Philander and Kagiso Rabada used seam, bounce and pace to dismantle them, the batsmen only managed a century and three fifties between them in three Tests.In England, James Anderson, Sam Curran, Chris Woakes and Stuart Broad have left India’s batting exposed against sideways movement in overcast and seaming conditions. The most worrisome thing for Kohli, head coach Ravi Shastri and batting coach Sanjay Bangar is the uncertainty in mind and technique every specialist batsman has displayed, thus allowing England’s bowlers to seize the initiative without needing to toil.At Edgbaston India lasted 130.2 overs in total. At Lord’s they could barely play out a session in the first innings, getting bowled out in 35.2 overs. Nothing much changed in the second as their vigil persisted for 47 overs.Remarkably Kohli has faced 32% of all balls faced by India in the series so far, while M Vijay, Shikhar Dhawan, KL Rahul, Cheteshwar Pujara and Ajinkya Rahane put together have faced only 34%. Eight of India’s top 10 partnerships involve Kohli. Only three times so far have India put on a partnership of 50 or more.So even before they travel to Nottingham to deal with the questions posed by England’s fast bowlers, India have a more pressing question to answer: What do they do about their top order?Getty ImagesVijay cannot seem to figure out whether he wants to bat defensively, which used to be his strength, or push the run rate as he attempted to in South Africa. Leaving the ball was how Vijay built his innings and transferred the pressure back onto the new-ball bowlers in his best years. But that strength has diminished now and he looks uncertain.Former India captain Sunil Gavaskar called Shikhar Dhawan the first “scapegoat” to fall each time there is a batting failure in the top order. Gavaskar felt India ought to play six batsmen and said Dhawan, being a left-hander, would provide variety. But Dhawan hasn’t looked solid right through the red-ball leg of this tour, bagging a pair in the warm-up match, getting out twice to loose drives at Edgbaston, and looking vulnerable even in the net sessions at Lord’s – where he was dropped – playing with hard hands and edging frequently.In the first innings at Lord’s, Rahul got a jaffa from Anderson. On Sunday morning, he overbalanced while playing forward and across the line, a risky idea given Anderson was bowling from the Pavilion End, from where the Lord’s slope tends to aid the incoming delivery. Anderson’s inswinger duly trapped him plumb in front.Rahul understood his mistake and shook his head at Pujara, who might have suggested going for a review. In the first innings Rahul had stood outside the crease, as he had done at Edgbaston following Kohli’s example to negate the swing. However, on Sunday, Rahul stood back in his crease. He spent close to half an hour at the crease in both innings, but struggled to find his footing and returned disappointed.Of all the Indian batsman at Lord’s, Pujara showed the most composure. He faced the most balls and spent the most minutes at the crease of all of India’s batsmen, having replaced Dhawan. Pujara put aside the farcical run out in the first innings and started afresh on Sunday. Anderson tested his patience and his technique by probing the off-stump line while seaming the odd delivery back in.A brief passage of play lasting about half an hour after lunch on day four, when Pujara and Rahane resisted grittily, was the best phase of batting for India. The runs trickled rather than flowed, but the contest showed portents of a resurgence.The argument against Pujara is he slows things down, increasing the pressure on the rest of the batting order. But at Lords’s, playing time was the best solution in the overcast conditions. Pujara plays to a pattern. For the first 30 runs of his innings Pujara’s strike rate is 34 in England, Australia, New Zealand and South Africa while it is 44 in Asia since January 2016. Should Pujara not score at a faster clip so he can get build his confidence simultaneously and be more effective?Getty ImagesThen there is Rahane, India’s vice-captain. Like Kohli, Rahane spoke about conquering the situations in the mind after India were bundled out for 107 in the first innings. Yet, on Sunday, when confronted with the challenge of arresting a collapse after India were 13 for 2, Rahane showed frail technique against the moving ball once again. Rahane’s highest score so far in this series is 18. In four innings he has edged three times to the slips and once to keeper Johnny Bairstow. It makes for disheartening reading, given he was India’s most consistent batsman on their previous cycle of overseas tours from December 2013 to January 2015.Between Vijay, Dhawan, Rahul, Pujara and Rahane, only one – Pujara – has a 50 on this year’s tours of South Africa and England. Vijay is the only one to have played all five Test matches. Rahul and Pujara have played four each, Rahane three and Dhawan two.Given that only one has been an ever-present, critics have blamed Kohli and Shastri for chopping and changing constantly and failing to provide their players any security. Kohli has made at least one change in each of his 37 Tests as captain. It is a fair point. It is important that the team management has a clear chat with the players to figure out what is troubling them.Summarising the batting woes, Kohli suggested the issue was more mental than technical. “I don’t see any technical deficiency,” Kohli said after the innings defeat at Lord’s, his worst as a captain. “If a batsman is clear in the head and he’s clear about the plans he’s taking, then if the ball does something off the pitch, you’re able to counter it.”The batsmen, Kohli stressed, need to stop clouding their minds with scenarios that don’t exist. “The only thing that can work and which does work is being very clear and blank in your head, and then reacting to what the ball is doing rather than expecting it to do something. The focus has to be what the team requires and not what individual games need to be. We are going to try our level best to get into that frame of mind where we are thinking team all the time and then the intent will come through. We’ll be scoring runs, taking on the bowling and showing more intent with the bat, which is what is required from the next game onwards.”The implications of Kohli’s injury are serious. If he fails to regain fitness for the Trent Bridge Test, or even the rest of the series, do India have a back-up plan? Do India have the backbone?

The importance of being Shakib

His ability to adapt to any situation makes the Bangladesh allrounder an invaluable part of the Sunrisers outfit and, overall, a T20 gem

Sreshth Shah17-May-2018Underrated. It’s a word long associated with Shakib Al Hasan – the world’s best allrounder in two formats and third-best in the other. Bought for INR 2 crore (USD 312,500 approx), Sunrisers Hyderabad would, perhaps, consider it as one of the biggest heists of the 2018 IPL auction.Genuine allrounders – players that can make the XI based on any one skill – are rare in cricket, and good genuine allrounders are even rarer. That can be noted in the price tags of these players: Ben Stokes – INR 12.50 crore (USD 1.93mn), Andre Russell – INR 8.50 crore (USD 1.33mn) , Hardik Pandya – INR 11 crore (USD 1.72mn), Krunal Pandya – INR 8.8 crore (USD 1.38mn). Yet Shakib drew interest from only two teams – Rajasthan Royals and Sunrisers – and was bought for a salary close to one-sixth of Stokes and Hardik and nearly one-fourth of Russell and Krunal.With their middle order – Manish Pandey, Yusuf Pathan and Wriddhiman Saha – failing to live up to expectation, and Rashid Khan being uncharacteristically expensive for his own standards (economy 7.20), Shakib needed to shine for his new franchise. And he has.

Four of his 12 wickets have come in the Powerplay, at an economy of 7.80 and a ridiculously high dot-ball percentage of 41.66. In the first six overs, Shakib has conceded a boundary only once every five balls

The 2 for 23 against Royals showed early glimpses of jhis value. And Shakib followed that up with a cameo of 27 and a haul of 2 for 21 against his former team Kolkata Knight Riders.Then, Shakib’s 1 for 16 strangled Mumbai Indians, bowling them out for 87 in a chase of 119. He helped defend another small total (132) with 2 for 18 against Kings XI Punjab. Against Royal Challengers Bangalore, Shakib displayed resolve to churn out a 32-ball 35 on a sticky batting surface and returned to pick up 2 for 36.The numbers themselves may not be breathtaking, but remember that under captain Kane Williamson, Shakib has been trusted with bowling in the Powerplay, which is basically a graveyard for spinners. And not only has he managed to keep up the pressure built by the pacers, but by keeping the runs down, he has allowed Sunrisers’ maverick spinner Rashid to go for the kill.What makes Shakib such a great fit at Sunrisers is that his bowling isn’t meant to take wickets for them. There’s Bhuvneshwar Kumar and Rashid for that. Shakib’s improved economy of 7.72 this season has helped the rest of their bowlers thrive in the middle overs. His experience as Bangladesh captain, too, has helped Williamson and Sunrisers’ young Indian bowlers wade through some rough waters.Of course, keeping runs in check will naturally force an error from batsmen in T20 cricket, and Shakib’s Powerplay wickets have assisted Sunrisers in becoming the season’s best bowling team. He showed that against Delhi Daredevils, when he struck off two consecutive balls to send their openers packing. Against RCB, he trapped a rampaging Parthiv Patel lbw to apply the brakes on the pursuit of a par score. In all, four of his 12 wickets have come in the Powerplay, at an economy of 7.80 and a ridiculously high dot-ball percentage of 41.66. In the first six overs, Shakib has conceded a boundary only once every five balls.Pure numbers say Stokes, Hardik, Krunal and Russell have scored more runs than Shakib this season. But he has been batting at a bowler-friendly venue – the Rajiv Gandhi Stadium in Hyderabad. And while other teams need their allrounders to make that match-winning impact, Sunrisers need Shakib to plug gaps in their performance wherever they may be. These skills – of adapting to the game’s situation and moulding oneself to the team’s structure – makes Shakib an invaluable part of the Sunrisers outfit and, overall, a T20 gem.

'I'd be a dinosaur if I could come back as an animal'

Harbhajan Singh on reincarnation, the music he plays in the dressing room, bingeing on Netflix, and the fastest bowler he faced

Interview by Scott Oliver19-Sep-2018What was your best memory as a cricketer?
Lots, but probably the 2011 World Cup.What’s the toughest time you’ve had as a cricketer?
Early on, when I had to go for a chucking test and came to England to get my bowling action looked at [by Fred Titmus, in 1998]. That was very tough.Your 2001 series against Australia was phenomenal, with 32 wickets. Did you ever bowl better? And did that create a burden for you to live up to for the rest of the career?
Yes, it probably did create a burden, but that series also gave me everything. I think I probably did bowl better at different times, but never got similar results. I took maybe 24 or 25 wickets [in a series], but maybe didn’t have the same amount of luck on my side. In 2001, whatever I was touching turned to gold.Who is the most skilful batsman you played with?
Sachin Tendulkar.Who was the toughest guy to bowl at in Tests?
When Matthew Hayden was at his peak, I felt he was the toughest. He attacked, and at the same time he’s got that build, that aura – he’s there to dominate. Apart from him, Inzamam-ul-Haq was also very tough to get out.Which cricketer you played with trained hardest and with the most dedication?
Rahul Dravid. He worked really hard on his game and till the end continued to try to do something to get better results for himself and the team.Who is the funniest person you have played cricket with?
It’s a hard one, but probably Virat Kohli. He mimics really well. He’ll meet you and within ten minutes he’ll be doing exactly what you do: your voice, your walk, your hands, everything.And the smartest cricketer?
That must be Anil Kumble.Do you have any superstitions?
I do, but I don’t need to go into the specifics… I had my routine when I was bowling. Let’s just say it had a lot to do with my bowling shoes, which one to wear first. Even now in IPL, I follow that. Whatever works for me, I do the same through the season.It’s the IPL final, last ball, six needed, and you’re bowling. Who do you want to be facing?
AB de Villiers.Which is the better feeling: a Test hat-trick or a Test hundred?
Test hat-trick. Especially Ponting, Gilchrist, Warne.”Matthew Hayden was the toughest batsman. He attacked, and at the same time he’s got that build, that aura – he’s there to dominate”•Getty ImagesPonting was your bunny for a while…
I don’t know about that, but I did get him out quite a lot. I don’t know how that happened, but it did. Maybe he was watching my face instead of the ball. You get into that zone sometimes: “Oh no, that bowler again.” More than me doing anything, he was getting himself out, because it’s not as if he didn’t know how to play against offspin.You were the middle one of Stuart Broad’s hat-trick at Trent Bridge in 2011, but got quite a large inside edge on the ball. What did you do when you got back to the dressing room?
Oh yes, that was a shocker. Thanks for reminding me! I didn’t throw my kit but I was a bit upset, honestly.Who was the best captain you played under?
Sourav Ganguly. He took over when the team was going through quite a lot – match-fixing scandals and things – and he backed a lot of youngsters and brought the team together. He allowed us to express ourselves, saying it is what we should be doing to win Test matches.Who was the best coach you played under?
Gary Kirsten. He was more of a friend than a coach. He didn’t say much, but when he did, it meant something.You thought about going to the USA to drive trucks after your father’s death?
I wasn’t sure what I was going to do, but I was definitely looking for the option to go abroad and do something in life, to feed my family back home. I don’t come from a family with a lot of money. When my father passed away, I could continue with cricket – but I was going through a lot of dramas out there, problems with the cricket board… Or I could take the easy option and go abroad to work. As what? Could be anything: truck driver, labourer, filling petrol, whatever. I had a lot of close friends who’d moved to America who were sending money home that way. I’m very happy I made the right decision, though!If you could wave a magic wand and have any experience in another sport, what would you choose?
Winning the Wimbledon final. And I’d like to win the world heavyweight title, to know how it feels to be Muhammad Ali.Can you cook? If so, what’s your signature dish?
I don’t cook, not really, but I can make an omelette. And rice. My wife says it’s not cooking.What’s the worst injury you had?
I tore my ligament in my bowling finger playing against New Zealand in India, just before going on tour to Australia. I went into that series with an injury because the captain wanted me to go on tour. I told him that I was injured, but he said, “No, I need you there.” The injury got a lot worse and took me out of the game for eight months, which meant I missed that historic series against Pakistan [2003-04].Which cricketer has the worst dress sense?
You’re getting me in trouble, but Rahul Dravid. Sorry, Rahul.And the best?
Old days, I think Imran Khan – those , as we say it. Modern days, Virat Kohli dresses really well.If you are in charge of the dressing-room music, what do you play?
Punjabi music. It’s amazing. Everybody loves the beats.Your favourite holiday destination?
New York.You are on a long-haul flight. What do you watch: Hollywood or Bollywood?
Actually, I watch Netflix nowadays. I just finished , about Pablo Escobar. And I watched the Trump documentaries. Netflix is my new toy.If you could be reincarnated as any animal, what would you choose?
A dinosaur.Who is the quickest bowler you faced?
Shoaib Akhtar. Crazy pace.If you were putting together an IPL squad, who would be the first three picks?
Can I have five? I’ll go for Jasprit Bumrah, Rohit Sharma, AB de Villiers, Lasith Malinga and Ben Stokes. No, MS Dhoni for the last place. Sorry, Ben!What about a World XI for Test cricket: who are the first three names on the team sheet?
Current: Virat Kohli, Joe Root and Jimmy Anderson. All-time: Sachin Tendulkar, Viv Richards and Kapil Dev.

How do you replace 12,000 Test runs?

England have struggled to find a partner for Alastair Cook for the last six years. Who can fill shoes?

George Dobell05-Sep-2018Haseeb Hameed

Age: 21
First-class average: 30.91
By the time he returned from England’s tour to India at the end of 2016 with a finger injury, Hameed looked destined to replicate the smooth transition of Cook into Test cricket. It was not to be, though. He has averaged just 19.52 in first-class cricket in the subsequent couple of seasons without a single century. The 2018 season has been especially gruesome: he has averaged just 9.70 in the Championship and is currently unable to get into the Lancashire side.Rory Burns
Age: 28
First-class average: 43.92
As the first – and at present, only – man to have scored 1000 Championship runs in 2018, Burns has been knocking at the door hard all summer. He is, in some ways, similar to Cook: left-handed, not especially easy on the eye, but blessed with good judgement outside off stump and strong levels of concentration. He has now scored 1000 first-class runs in each of the last five seasons and has drawn praise from Dale Steyn among others. He also has the highest first-class average on this list. He can probably count himself most unfortunate if he does not win a place in the Sri Lanka tour party.Rory Burns acknowledges his third hundred of the season•Getty ImagesNick Gubbins
Age: 24
First-class average: 35.94
Long seen as one to look out for, Gubbins is another left-hander with some similarities to Andrew Strauss. He scored more than 1400 first-class runs as Middlesex won the Championship in 2016 but suffered a drop off in the form the following season. A particularly good player of fast bowling, he has a reputation of being uncomfortable against spin and endured a tough Lions tour to the Caribbean last winter. With winter tours to Sri Lanka and the Caribbean coming up, that may count against him.Ben Duckett
Age: 23
First-class average: 39.21
When Duckett scored more than 2700 runs in all formats during the 2016 season, he was promoted to both the Test and ODI sides. But he found the step-up in class tougher than anticipated and, struggling against spin in particular, was dropped after four Tests produced an average of just 15.71. He has not found life easy since returning to the county game, either. He averaged 25.00 for Northants in Division Two cricket this season and, having just moved to Nottinghamshire, batted at No. 4 on debut. Not having the best disciplinary reputation – he was dropped from the Lions team after an incident in Perth during the Ashes – will do him few favours, too.Keaton Jennings
Age: 26
First-class average: 33.84
With a batting average of 22.65 after 11 Tests, Jennings can probably count himself somewhat fortunate to retain a place in the England side for the Oval Test. As the man in possession, though, he has a decent chance of retaining a spot on tour simply because the selectors may be reluctant to blood two new openers at the same time. His equable temperament has impressed the England management, but the lack of runs is becoming a serious problem.Mark Stoneman gets well forward to drive•Getty ImagesMark Stoneman
Age: 31
First-class average: 34.91
Dropped by England only a few months ago, it seems too early for Stoneman to return. He has recently returned to county cricket – after some time away for personal reasons – with a century but, after averaging 27.68 in his 11 Tests, he may have to score heavily for some time to push for a recall.Joe Denly
Age: 32
First-class average: 36.65
It’s nine years since Denly last played international cricket – and limited-overs international cricket, at that – and, at the end of 2014, when he was released by Middlesex, it seemed his career could be over. But, after a couple of good seasons in the county game, he is back in the mix. In some ways he fits the bill nicely: he is a right-handed batsman and decent legspinner. And, after four first-class centuries in 2017, he has managed three more this year. It would be a remarkable selection – Denly tends not to open any more – he has gone in at No. 3 and No. 4 in his last few games – and he plays in Division Two of the Championship, but it does seem it could happen.Daryl Mitchell acknowledges his century•Getty ImagesAlex Hales
Age: 29
First-class average: 37.81
Having given-up red-ball cricket for now, it seems unlikely Hales will be considered even though Adil Rashid has reversed his decision – in somewhat different circumstances, given the lack of spinners available – to return to the Test side this season.Jason Roy
Age: 28
First-class average: 37.72
There was definitely some interest from the England management in playing Roy in the Test side earlier this summer but, as he has not played a first-class game this year and plays in the middle-order for Surrey, he can probably not be considered a serious candidate.Daryl Mitchell
Age: 34
First-class average: 40.72
As the only man on this list other than Burns with a first-class average of 40, Mitchell should be under consideration. It seems his age may count against him, though the example of Chris Rogers suggests it should not be the case. A compact right-hand batsman and good slip fielder, Mitchell has hit three Championship centuries in 2018 and only four men have more Division One runs this season.
*Stats as of September 4, 2018

Gregory's calm head and whirring bat keeps Somerset on course

Somerset’s captain Lewis Gregory anticipates Finals Day in the Blast and admits: “Two years ago I wouldn’t have been the one trying to calm everybody down”

Paul Edwards12-Sep-2018Imagine this if you will: you are captaining a side in a vital T20 match and your bowlers are under the pump. There’s one right- and one left-hander batting and the umpires are saying you are on the way to a six-run penalty for bowling your overs too slowly. The least of your problems is that a capacity crowd is on your back.Lewis Gregory doesn’t need to imagine such things. He experienced precisely that when he skippered Somerset to a five-run defeat against Kent at Canterbury in his side’s final match in the Vitality Blast South Group. The game was televised and every twist of fate received close attention. Fortunately for Somerset, they still scraped a home quarter-final and now find themselves at Finals Day.Because they are so short, T20 games magnify the significance of a captain’s decisions. Put a bowler on at the wrong end and before you know it you are explaining your mistake to the TV audience. The only benefit of such experiences is that they are probably good preparation for Finals Day on Saturday when Gregory’s decisions will receive the close attention of the massed thousands in Edgbaston’s Hollies Stand.”It’s tricky at times,” he acknowledged. “Kent was the hardest game for me when you had bowlers being taken off for bowling high full tosses, the ball disappearing to all parts and then time being taken to dry it.”We’ve found a good formula where people know when they will be doing things but you also have to trust your instinct and also trust that your snap judgement calls will be the right ones. We kind of stumbled across something that works but there have been times when we’ve gone outside the plan and made little changes. Fortunately we have a lot of experience in our squad. There are people I can consult and they have been helpful throughout the competition.”But when asked how much time there is to confer with lieutenants such as Johann Myburgh, Max Waller or Steve Davies, Gregory offers one of his favourite one-word replies.”Limited,” he said. “You’re always trying to think a few steps ahead so that you’re not making calls on a whim. But all hell was kicking loose in the Kent game and it became very tough, but then it was the same for both sides. You just have to make the calls.”In other words, when the analysts have done their work, Gregory will still need to make an old-fashioned tactical decision – and how much of that will be based on data? The additional pressure on Finals Day is that the destination of the trophy may depend on his choices. For example, in the run-chase at Canterbury Gregory sent in Tom Abell ahead of himself. Abell made 22 not out off 18 balls whereas Gregory, an accomplished hitter, later thumped an unbeaten 44 off 15. Should Gregory have batted above his four-day captain?Tom Abell responds to Somerset’s quarter-final win against Notts•Getty Images”Potentially,” he replies. “But it’s not just about winning matches, it’s about developing cricketers as well. Tom has a brilliant game but there are things he’s going to need to work on and that was a great opportunity for him to go and win a game of cricket. It didn’t quite work out that way but he’ll be a better cricketer because of it and I back that decision. I could have gone in and hit one straight up and the point wouldn’t have arisen.”All the same, this strategy thing clearly gets even trickier when, as is the case with Gregory, you are a fully-fledged all-rounder. Somerset’s captain is one of the five bowlers who have delivered the vast majority of their side’s overs in this year’s Blast and he has also made three fifties, the last of which, a 24-ball 60, did as much as anything to cook Nottinghamshire’s goose in the quarter-final. He also has to be able to captain Lewis Gregory.”I think I’ve been okay at that,” he said. “But if you’d given me this job two years ago, it would have been a very different story. What I’ve gone through with injuries has helped me as a leader and it’s enabled me to look at things differently. Two years ago I wouldn’t have been the one trying to calm people down; I would be the one having to be calmed down. You have to be able to take a step back and see the overall picture.”Perhaps so, but earlier in the season it seemed Gregory was being attracted by a bigger canvas still. After appearing to stall on a signing a new contract, he was seriously courted by four counties before eventually putting his signature on a three-year deal with Somerset in July. Since resolving that issue his form has improved but he regards the suggestion of any connection between the two as a good example of the post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy – because two events occurred in succession, the former event must have caused the latter.”I don’t think there’s any link,” he said. “I think it’s probably just a bit of a coincidence. I had a contract for the previous three years and I don’t see the new contract as being relevant at all. You can get in a bit of rhythm playing T20 and I just carried it on into the two Championship games we’ve played since.”That rhythm has enabled Gregory to notch two fifties and take six wickets in the defeat of Yorkshire before adding an unbeaten 64, the highest score of the match, in the tie against Lancashire. “A handsome innings by a handsome young man,” observed a member of the local media who had clearly forgiven Gregory’s earlier dalliance with other suitors.But things like loyalty matter very much in Somerset, a county which still mourns Jos Buttler’s move to Lancashire. Northamptonshire and Leicestershire may be almost reconciled to their best players being lured away by the prospect of First Division cricket and fatter salaries but folk in Taunton are puzzled as to why anyone would ever want to leave Somerset.Talking T20

Dan Norcross and Matt Roller start the build-up to the Vitalty Blast Finals Day
Listen on ESPN Radio

Stay awhile in the town and you can understand why they might feel such mystification. Taxi-drivers are not merely prepared to chat about cricket during a ride; they are very well-informed about the game and expect their passengers to be similarly knowledgeable. Gregory may be a Devonian – indeed, he was one of five who played against Lancashire – but the eastward paths to the County Ground are well beaten and Somerset is the team representing the West Country, an area of the country which remains very distant from England’s metropoles.When you take all this into account, you also begin to see why the anticipated coming of The Hundred is of no account when weighed against the possibility that Somerset may one day win their first County Championship. Hopes were high this year until Surrey hit form and depending how this week turns out Gregory’s team may travel to Finals Day Edgbaston knowing their chance has finally gone.Either way, finishing a four-day match against Hampshire less than 48 hours before their semi-final against Sussex hardly constitutes good preparation for a white-ball game that can be all but lost in a few overs. There must be a question as to how much time the rest of the squad will have to prepare for a big day.”Limited” Gregory replies. “It’s part of county cricket to be able to flick between formats but we’re probably quite lucky in that we have four or five guys who are just playing white-ball cricket. But some people will have to prepare in their own time. We’re going up to Birmingham on Thursday night, straight after the Hampshire match.”When Somerset take the field at Edgbaston Gregory will probably rely on the same bowlers he has deployed throughout the group stages. The runs, by slight contrast, have been distributed mainly between seven batsmen with only Corey Anderson scoring more than James Hildreth, who will be 34 when Finals Day takes place and is the only survivor from Somerset last T20 triumph in 20005.”Hildy is probably the most talented player in our dressing room and you see that in some of the knocks he plays,” said Gregory. “He’s always putting himself down in this format but we are now seeing him clear the ropes more often than we used to. It shows his hunger and where he wants to get to. He still has the desire to pull on an England shirt.”Gregory does not want for desire or confidence either. However gnomic or qualified his other comments might be, he has no doubt about the potential of the side he will lead on Saturday.”We believe we have the best team in the competition and we believe that if we perform anywhere near our best, we will win,” he said. “It is the belief of every guy who will step onto that field.”

Car mechanic to pace merchant – the rags-to-renown story of Tanveer-ul-Haq

The Rajasthan fast bowler’s 51-wicket season has come at the end of a long roller-coaster ride

Saurabh Somani23-Jan-2019Whenever Tanveer-ul-Haq has batted above No. 8 for Rajasthan, it has been as a nightwatchman. In a fairly young first-class career of 27 matches, Tanveer has gone up the order five times in 38 innings. He might have been thinking of the irony of life when he walked out those five times: if it wasn’t for fate, he might have been an actual nightwatchman.It’s what he had travelled to Jaipur for in 2010-11 from his native Dholpur, when his cricket career seemed to be going nowhere and the family’s finances weren’t in the best shape. But all his documents – identity cards and the like – fell on the road as he rode pillion with a friend on the way to the office he was hoping to join. Tanveer realised this only when he reached the office, and the job never materialised.It was a phase in which Tanveer had worked as a car mechanic, distributed newspapers on a borrowed bicycle in the mornings, and briefly pushed a hand-cart around trying to sell children’s clothes. Those days are past, though, and after 51 wickets for Rajasthan in the 2018-19 Ranji Trophy, the 27-year-old has made sure he will not be part of a revolving door in the immediate future.Rajasthan lost in the quarter-finals to Karnataka in a tight finish, but Tanveer’s season was stellar – an average of 18.52 and a strike-rate of 40.3, while bowling more overs than anyone else in the team.If not quite riches, it’s certainly a rags-to-betterment story.Things were very different a decade ago. “I played in 2007-08 at the Under-17 level, and then didn’t play for three years,” Tanveer tells ESPNcricinfo. “My father works in a tailor’s shop. He didn’t know initially about my work.”Tanveer had worked out a meticulous routine. He would leave after his father, and come back before him – and this was after going for cricket practice at an academy at 6am. The plan unraveled when Tanveer was late returning home one day. “He [his father] told me, ‘Am I not feeding you? What is your problem? You will not work henceforth.’That was the end of that, so Tanveer asked around and found that he could distribute newspapers. He couldn’t have imagined then that his pictures and stories of his exploits would one day be on the sports pages of those same newspapers. The friend who told him of the job also lent him a bicycle. This time the work was early in the morning, so his father thought he was off for and cricket practice. But another hurdle came about in the form of a scooter accident, leaving him with a gash above the left eye.

“I originally wanted to be a batsman. When I played with a tennis ball, I used to hit a lot of sixes. But I didn’t have enough money to buy a bat, so I said I’ll bowl. But my spin bowling was getting smashed. So I decided to bowl fast.”Tanveer-ul-Haq

“It (the work) paid about INR 300 per month (approximately USD 6 at that time). This was in 2008-09, and yes, 300 per month at that time was a pittance. But it was still money I needed,” he says. “I used to tell my mother everything, so she knew where I was going and that I was working. But when I had the accident, my mother also said no need to work, whatever is fated will happen.”Then I thought, ‘Now I can’t tell my mother also’,” smiles Tanveer. “That is when I took the job of pushing the handcart around with children’s clothes. But I did that for only a month because I couldn’t make any money, I wouldn’t even get INR 5 for one day.”So Tanveer went to Jaipur to try and become a security guard. “I thought I could work at night, practice in the morning, and then sleep during the day,” he says. But then he lost his papers. “I somehow spent 10-15 days in Jaipur, I had no money in my pocket either. Then I thought that I need to go back home, that is the one place left where I can still get a meal! So I came back home.”That was when Sumendra Tiwari came to his rescue. Tiwari, who would later go on to become the Rajasthan Cricket Association secretary, ran an academy in Dholpur. Tanveer had been part of the academy, and Tiwari had taken him under his wing.How that came about is a story of its own. A neighbour, Dushyant Tyagi, had been an age-group cricketer for Rajasthan, and after much pleading, he let Tanveer tag along to the academy with him.”I originally wanted to be a batsman. When I played with a tennis ball, I used to hit a lot of sixes,” Tanveer recalls. “But I didn’t have enough money to buy a bat, so I said I’ll bowl. But he (Tyagi) was a good batsman and used to smash my spin bowling. So I decided to bowl fast.”Tiwari liked what he saw of the boy, and sometime later asked him to come in whites to play an inter-academy match. Tanveer, naturally, didn’t have whites. He wore a white jersey that his school had given him for being part of the basketball team, and his father’s white pyjamas. The shoes he bought from a roadside seller. Tiwari took one look at him and hollered, ‘What are you wearing? Is this the way to dress for a match? Dress properly for the next game.'”But of course I didn’t have any other clothes to wear so I wore the same thing for the next match too. Then Tyagi told sir, ‘He doesn’t have the money for new clothes.’ And sir immediately said, ‘He should have told me!’ Then he took me to his home, gave me two sets of jerseys and pants, and a pair of Reebok shoes.”Tanveer-ul-Haq’s 51 wickets were a highlight of Rajasthan’s season•Saurabh Somani/ESPNcricinfoTanveer also had the keys to the equipment room at the academy, since he usually turned up for training early. That helped. “Sometimes people would forget their t-shirts or pants there. I would wait and see, if no one claimed it for a month or so, I’d take it home, wash it, and use it. That’s how I played cricket.”Tiwari continued to be a benevolent presence in Tanveer’s life. After his fruitless trip to Jaipur, he got a call from Tiwari, who asked him to try out for the Rajasthan Under-22 side.It was to be the start of a chain of events that would lead Tanveer to the Rajasthan senior team. But not without its own twists.Money to start with. Tiwari handed him INR 2000 for the trials in Udaipur, which allowed Tanveer to travel. “But when you go for trials, you have to bear your own expenses, so by the time it was done, I once again had no money,” he says. “If you get selected in the camp, then the board will put you up and take care of your expenses. So I asked sir if he could get me in the camp. I would have also made a bit of money then, with the TA and DA (travel allowance and daily allowance). He managed to get me a spot.”There were three matches and I got four wickets each in the first two matches and three in the third, but I was not selected for the Under-22 team. But Aniket (Choudhary, the fast bowler) was in the team then, and he played one match and was selected for the senior squad. So I got a chance, and it all started for me from there. I played in all the age groups, and then got into the Rajasthan squad.”Tanveer’s initial years with Rajasthan were marked by limited opportunities. He never played more than five matches in any of the first four seasons after his debut in 2014-15. Understandably enough too. Rajasthan had an embarrassment of riches in the pace department. There were Pankaj Singh, Deepak Chahar and Choudhary as the senior quicks. Among the younger crop were Khaleel Ahmed and Kamlesh Nagarkoti. All of them have played at a more prominent level than Rajasthan, except Tanveer. Which meant that whenever enough of them were available, it was Tanveer who sat out.But in 2018-19, there was finally the chance to play a full season, with other fast bowlers unavailable, playing elsewhere, or injured. And Tanveer responded by becoming the team’s highest wicket-taker.From bowling because he had no bat, Tanveer had now reached a stage in his journey where he was making batsmen look like they had never held a bat before.

Paine, Chandimal and their many captaincy stories

Ball-tampering, captaincy issues, forthright coaches: if the duo find the moment for a chat during this brief series they won’t be short of stories to share

Andrew McGlashan in Brisbane23-Jan-2019If Tim Paine and Dinesh Chandimal find the moment for a chat during this brief series they won’t be short of captaincy stories to share. One is the accidental skipper, the other the captain of a team where the longevity of the role can be decided on the whim of an administrator.They are also linked, dare we say, by the spectre of ball-tampering. It was the infamous use of sandpaper in Cape Town that propelled Paine into his current position nine months ago and Chandimal was found guilty of the offence during the second Test against West Indies in St Lucia last July.While Australia were caught red-handed and could offer no defence, the Sri Lankans did not take the situation lying down. The refused to take the field on the third day, delaying play by two hours before a truce was reached. But the outcome was that Chandimal, along with the team manager Asanka Gurusinha and coach Chandika Hathurusingha, were suspended for the two Tests against South Africa.All that meant Chandimal wasn’t present for Sri Lanka’s series-levelling win in Barbados or the 2-0 win over South Africa which followed. Then he was only able to play one of three Tests against England due to a hamstring injury. That series was lost 3-0 on home soil, a real kick in the guts for Sri Lanka, and while the 1-0 loss in New Zealand was more expected, it has all left Chandimal with some catching up to do.Still, it’s not a patch on the job Paine has had to undertake. After the emergency role in Johannesburg he had to wait until October to start the Test captaincy for real. That began with a 1-0 loss against Pakistan in the UAE – hardly surprising given Australia’s travails in Ashes – followed by the recent 2-1 defeat against India.ALSO READ: Sri Lanka’s best chance to win in Australia?India played some magnificent cricket and were worthy winners. They could well have beaten an Australia team in far better shape than this one. But the series continued to shine a spotlight on the major issues in Australia: selection uncertainty and weak batting at the top of the list. Usually a visit of Sri Lanka would be seen as almost a given for Australia to win (11 wins and two draws in the head-to-head is a one-sided history) but such is the upheaval that has gone on that, while an Australia win remains favourite, it is by no means a certainty.Getty ImagesThrough all the challenges, Paine, who had almost lost his voice on the eve of this Test, has carried himself with dignity and, at times, no little humour. He was, without doubt, the right captain for the moment but that doesn’t mean he can afford to not turn around fortunes. Victory over Sri Lanka would not mean everything was okay again, but it would afford Paine a chance to take stock in a more positive frame of mind ahead of the Ashes later this year.For Chandimal, a defeat on tour is unlikely to make or break his captaincy – which dates back to 2017 – although in Sri Lankan cricket you can never quite tell. His team are in the midst of a very challenging overseas spell playing New Zealand, Australia and South Africa. The expectation is that will come away with very little, so in one sense Chandimal doesn’t have much to lose but he has spoken of his desire to be the captain who ends the team’s wait for success in Australia.It will be an awkward feeling for him that Sri Lanka’s best victories in recent times (Barbados and the South Africa series) have come without him in the team. That would all be forgotten with a win in Brisbane or Canberra. In his favour is that the captaincy appears to have suited his batting: his average as captain is 46.30, three runs higher than his career number, and has included fine centuries in Abu Dhabi, Delhi and, before the ball-tampering, St Lucia.Paine has also played his part with the bat, to the extent that he was Australia’s second-highest run-scorer last year albeit in a narrow field. He fronted up well against India but could not convert his starts. There was even an argument he should bat higher, but that appears unlikely to happen. He has enough on his plate.Both captains are also operating with coaches firmly in the spotlight. Justin Langer is trying to rebuild the culture around the Australian team (elite honesty and all that) while Hathurusingha is a forceful figure, believed to be the highest paid Sri Lanka coach in their history and not a man to take fools kindly. His response to Sri Lanka’s ongoing no-ball problem was refreshingly blunt: “It’s about being aware of the white line in front of you basically.”Ultimately, though, captains can only work with what they have. Australia’s main absentees are well documented while Sri Lanka are without Angelo Mathews for this series and settling into life without Rangana Herath. There is hope for both to cling to as well: Steven Smith and David Warner will be back sometime soon while Sri Lanka have some talented young players.In the short term, however, there is plenty for them to ponder. Paine is trying to lead his side to much-needed late-season victory while Chandimal is trying to defy history. Whoever comes out on top in the next couple of weeks will feel just a little bit better about life at the helm.

Leaders in their field: New Zealand sweat the small stuff in big win

The effort to save singles and cut off fours showed that New Zealand, as ever at World Cups, mean business

Sharda Ugra in Cardiff01-Jun-2019The ground filled quickly, the weather produced its best, the skies all powder blue, no greys, and plenty of sunshine. People had travelled a good distance, some even from Birmingham to support their team, but Cardiff’s World Cup opener ended up being what in the southern hemisphere is called a fizzer. On a green wicket, the grass cover meant to hold together the dry surface beneath, New Zealand’s seamers were disciplined and efficient in what were conditions very similar to home and the Sri Lanka batsmen as a whole, barring captain Dimuth Karunaratne, obliged.When given 136 to chase, New Zealand’s openers carved out the bowling and the match ended around the time when a full ODI conventionally returns from its first-innings lunch break. Martin Guptill batted at breakneck speed and in break-spirit mode, depositing one ball out of the ground and maybe into the river (it didn’t come back) and New Zealand did what they intended to do in this World Cup. Cardiff has fired the shot to let the rest of the field know that while the Big Three or Four (England, India, Australia and South Africa) grab more notice, New Zealand are ignored at everyone’s peril. This on a day when Tim Southee sat out due to a niggle and Trent Boult’s only wicket was Suranga Lakmal in the second-last over of the innings.ALSO READ: Karunaratne’s record in Sri Lanka’s World Cup lowAs efficient as they were with ball and bat, what also ran through New Zealand’s performance in Cardiff was the industry-strength adhesive that keeps their other skills together. As a team, New Zealand are (by and large, let it be said, as the World Cup quarter-final v South Africa, Dhaka 2011 suddenly popped into mind) neither demonstrative, emotional nor fiery. That magic glue, their fielding, too, is smooth, noiseless almost, where ground is covered and advantage extracted in quiet, swift movement.The most memorable pieces of Cardiff’s largely drama-less, incident-free match will not be New Zealand’s pieces of fielding, which would have been forgotten among the 280-odd balls bowled. Pieces of fielding, mind, not catches or run-outs, or earth-shaking ‘turning points’, just bread-and-butter stuff, done with the respect given to the metaphorical jam.

  • It begins with Boult (6.4). In Matt Henry’s second over, Karunaratne flicks the ball off his hip, and it is racing to the rope; Boult at long leg, has just bowled the previous over and makes a short sprint, he knows he must stop the ball or it will be four. He dives forward like he were made of water, not of bone and muscle, and flows into its path, diverts it, gets to his feet races over to pick up the ball and return it. One run.
  • 13.6 – Angelo Mathews is in, he is the one capable of absorbing pressure along with Karunaratne and taking Sri Lanka away from the mess that is 58 for 4. Mathews latches on to a low-rising Lockie Ferguson short one and pulls. Mathews is a big burly fellow, he has gone six balls without scoring and the shot is full-blooded. Four when it leaves his bat. Boult is at short midwicket and throws himself left to stop it dead. Dot ball.
  • 16.3 – Sri Lanka have lost two wickets in five balls, the innings is falling apart but Thisara Perera can counterattack and his back-foot drive off Colin de Grandhomme is handsomely rolling through extra cover with Kane Williamson in pursuit. Inches from the boundary line it is pulled in and whipped back. Three runs. When it’s 73 for 6, such a big deal about a single? Of course. It is Williamson, he has covered massive, enormous ground but looks like he’s not even sweating. There is no huffing and puffing.
  • 18.5 – Karunaratne is now trying to make the switch from his Test-cricket-like innings to a faster pace,because it is 84 for 6. He forces Boult off his back foot, slightly outside the off, it is a crisp, clean shot. It deserved the runs on it, had not Jimmy Neesham, ambidextrous cricketer, all-around social media wit, dived low and stopped the ball. No run.

Trent Boult only took one wicket but helped set the tone in the field•AFPThese were blink-and-miss it snatches in a match which will be remembered for New Zealand’s bold statement in CWC19. A scan of ESPNcricinfo’s commentary and scoring teams found that there were no misfields or overthrows from New Zealand during the Sri Lanka innings. The only chance put down was Thisara Perera off Mitchell Santner, a thumping drive which was parried by the bowler towards mid-off. New Zealand may have started with the good fortune of winning the toss on a green one, and they were never under pressure in the match. But all through, they certainly fielded like they were, where every run conceded marked a step away from where they want to go.Fielding of such a standard is almost a non-negotiable in World Cups. Guptill said later that the event had “great fielding sides all over the place… If you can be one of the top two or three of the best fielding teams in the competition you can save a lot of runs and go a long way to winning the competition.” New Zealand’s group draw gives them Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Afghanistan before they meet India in Nottingham on June 13. By that time, if they are only a couple of wins away from a semi-final spot, it is the small, forgettable stuff of the kind we saw on Saturday in Cardiff, that will have taken them that far.

Don't blame Dhoni or the boundary, the better side won

The curious ending to the match provoked anger and suspicion among fans but there are good cricketing reasons why it ended the way it did

Sambit Bal01-Jul-2019A day before India took on England at Edgbaston, a comment published on our site summed up the significance: “For the first time since 1947, 1.2 billion Indians, 200 million Pakistanis, 150 million Bangladeshis and 20 million Sri Lankans will be praying for an Indian win.”Consequently, the anguish over India’s 31-run loss, featuring a slowdown late in the chase, has been widespread. The result instantly ended Sri Lanka’s thin and largely academic semi-final chances, and jeopardised the prospects of Pakistan and Bangladesh. The passion of the subcontinental fans has been the soul of this World Cup but, as ever, it’s a double-edged sword and, expectedly, angry questions were raised.Here’s an attempt to answer some of the big ones, without emotion and with, hopefully, some cricket sense.What was Dhoni thinking in those final overs?
I would be a millionaire if I knew. But let me hazard a guess. First, it shouldn’t be a huge surprise if you have seen MS Dhoni bat in the last few years. His calculations are his own, and they are based on assessing the conditions, opposition bowlers, and his own ability. These calculations work out very often for him in the IPL, where there are, inevitably, bowlers to target and where, because of the shorter match length, it is possible to create a higher impact in a shorter burst. This approach was always going to be riskier in the 50-over game, but it was a known risk for India.There is also bafflement about why he doesn’t unleash the big strokes until the very end when he is clearly capable of them – two sixes in the last over in the match against West Indies, and one against England here – but he has clearly built his game plan on the elimination of risk till it is unavoidable. It is possible – and this is the most plausible explanation – that he had abandoned all realistic possibilities of a win much earlier than everyone else, and took the more pragmatic option: protecting India’s net run-rate for future eventualities.We have this from our stats wizard Shiva Jayaraman: If we assume India were all out at 267, when Hardik Pandya got out – which was the worst case scenario – India’s NRR would have been 0.718. This would have meant that, had India lost by an average margin of 63 runs in both their remaining games and Bangladesh won by an equivalent margin in both theirs, they would overtake India on NRR. Reaching 306 has given India a 10-run cushion – the average defeat margin can be as high as 73, and Bangladesh need to win by 73 runs or more.If you, like many cricket analysts, think that this should not be the attitude of a team looking to win a World Cup, you are possibly right.It will be absolute conjecture to say that Dhoni’s arrival influenced the way Hardik Pandya batted, but for someone who makes a living out of smoking spinners for sixes, to knock three singles off Adil Rashid in what would most certainly be the final over by a spinner, when 95 runs were required off 54 balls, defied logic. Pandya was 22 off 12 balls when Dhoni arrived; he scored 23 off the 21 balls he faced after that.But it’s worth understanding that Dhoni didn’t, in this instance, cost India the match. His innings only made the defeat look worse than it might have been.MS Dhoni struggled to accelerate during a steep chase•Getty ImagesDid India do this to stuff Pakistan?
Normally, such a question wouldn’t merit an answer, and such a question was also raised by Indian fans when Pakistan lost a match in similar circumstances during the Champions Trophy in 2009 – India needed Pakistan to beat Australia in order to qualify. But since someone as prominent, and sensible in my mind, as Waqar Younis has raised the point, the matter should be put in perspective.Waqar might know this himself: international cricketers don’t go about losing matches to stuff someone else. There are the questions of momentum, confidence and pride in personal performance. And, of course, simple logic: who would India rather play in the semi-final, a team that they have beaten seven times in the World Cup, or the team with the maximum potential to beat them.There is also this other thing: the better team on the day won. It was a must-win game for England, and they brought their best game in the conditions that suited them perfectly.Did the shorter square boundary on one side go against India?
Virat Kohli called it crazy and bizarre that they were confronted with the shortest permissible square boundary on one side on the flattest of pitches. It certainly hurt India more as England exploited it mercilessly against the Indian spinners. Jonny Bairstow targeted that boundary forensically, hitting five of his six sixes to that region, and Ben Stokes pulled out an outrageous reverse slog for six off Yuzvendra Chahal over the square boundary there.But the playing square wasn’t picked yesterday. The rotation of pitches at all matches and at all venues was finalised, according to information available to us, through a long and collaborative process among the groundsmen, the ICC and the ICC’s pitch consultant as early as in the first week of January.And the ground dimensions were the same for both teams; England chose the team for the conditions by opting for the hit-the-deck variety of Liam Plunkett over the offspin of Moeen Ali. And since they had the option of Stokes, Rashid, their lone spinner, bowled only six overs from the more suitable end. Between them, the Indian spinners went for 160 from their 20 overs, and Kohli couldn’t have bowled both of them from the same end.Of course, the dimensions suited England. But even perfect conditions need perfect execution. They blasted nearly 150 in 15 overs from the tenth over; finished the innings with a flourish; Chris Woakes, their opening bowler, delivered three successive maidens and they pulled out brilliant stops. India were really stuffed when they were 28 for 1 in the tenth over. And they didn’t manage a single six till the final over of the match.Did Rohit and Kohli mess up then?
For India to have a chance to mount their highest-ever World Cup chase, and given the kind of batting to follow, Rohit Sharma and Kohli needed to bat big. The standard Indian template, while both setting up and chasing, is to set the platform with wickets in hand, and build the tempo evenly. The absence of Shikhar Dhawan has cost India early momentum, and KL Rahul made this worse yesterday with a nine-ball duck that left them at eight runs after three overs. Rohit just couldn’t find the gaps, and Kohli, after two successive fours off Jofra Archer, swung and missed a few times.But credit to the England bowlers. Woakes was McGrath-like for five overs, and it took a walk down the pitch from Kohli to hit a four off him, and Archer, bowling regularly at over 145 kph, hardly bowled a hittable one. India’s 28 for 1 was the lowest Powerplay score in the tournament, and India have never chased over 325 from such a frugal start.Did India choose the wrong team for the conditions?
Hindsight produces infinite wisdom, but they went with the bowling combination that has made them the ODI team that they are. Wristspin is often the best antidote against mid-innings power-hitting, and picking Bhuvneshwar Kumar or Ravindra Jadeja ahead of Kuldeep Yadav or Yuzvendra Chahal would have meant fiddling with what’s not broken. Few would have anticipated them going for 160 off 20.Then drop Kedar Jadhav for the next game?
Possibly, but not because of this performance. He was not the reason why India lost so badly in the end. He had no scope to influence the match. The pitch was absolutely sluggish by the time he came in to bat, and the asking rate was beyond him. But if he is not bowling, or being trusted to bowl, India ought to reconsider his utility.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus